I am the occupant of the Aaron and Cherie Raznick Chair of Economics
in the Economics Department
at the University of California Santa
Barbara.
Every year, I am asked to referee many more journal articles than I have time to handle adequately. University libraries complain that the rapid escalation of journal prices and the proliferation of new journals makes it impossible for them to maintain adequate collections of books and journals within their budgets.
I just don't see why I should supply free refereeing services to those publishers that use monopoly pricing to gouge our university budgets. I have made a new millenial resolution to stop refereeing papers for journals that charge library subscription rates greater than $1000 and to exercise preference for journals that charge less than $300. I do feel a professional obligation to review papers, but I can perform this obligation just as well by doing my refereeing for journals that arenot exploiting university libraries.
Here is a list of library subscription prices for a large selection of economics journals and here is a rogues' gallery of journals that cost libraries more than $1000 per year.
My new policy leaves plenty of options, for example: the new Journal of Public Economic Theory ($240 per year to libraries)or the AER, ($142 per year), Econometrica ($178), the Canadian Journal ($120), or the Journal of Political Economy ($159). On the other hand, I will not be refereeing for the Journal of Public Economics ($1431), Economic Letters($1492) or Public Choice ($1000 per year).
It seems to me that the publishers that overprice their journals would be up a creek if they lost the good will of the referees who provide them with free refereeing. The gougers have lost mine, at least until they cut their prices.
I hope that many other scholars will take a similar view and will tell the editors and publishers of the overpriced journals about it.
If you are thinking about asking your library to cancel some overpriced
journals and substitute cheaper, better ones, you will want to know
something about the number of times this journal is cited. Here is
a list of economics journals ranked by
price per
recent citation
Here is An Excel spreadsheet with all of my data on journal prices, citations, and page lengths.
In case you want to suggest that your library drop some expensive journals
and add some cheap ones, I have made up two spreadsheets, one listing
some overpriced journals in order of their cost per citation and one listing
some reasonably priced journals
Click
here for spreadsheets listing journals with high and low costs per citation
I have written a paper on overpriced journals and
how we might deal with them. This paper will appear in the Journal
of Economic Perspectives, later this year.
Free Labor
for Costly Journals? (formatted for onscreen viewing)
PDF
file (formatted for printing)
Carl Bergstrom and I have written a paper, intended for a general audience,
on the economics of library purchases of electronic site licenses to academic
journals. Click
here to see an abstract and access a pdf copy of this paper.
Would you believe that there are two economics journals that list their
library subscription rates at more than $7500 per year but have almost
no citations in recent years? Would you believe that any libraries
would subscribe to them? Are you curious about which universities
are sorichor so gullible that they subscribe to these journals?
Click here to
find out.
The Association of Research Libraries maintains the SPARC website, a useful source of information about journalpricing for science, technology, and medical journals.
The Association of Research Libraries sponsors an initiative called Create Change intended to "shift control of scholarly publicationsaway from commercial publishers and back to scholars.
Public Library of Science A large group of medical researchers and biologists have signed an open letterin which they request that all journals give all of their archivalmaterial to the public domain for distribution through online public libraries.
Scientific
publishing: A research mathematician's viewpoint, by Joan Birman
Comparative
Prices of Math Journals (and what to do about it) by Rob Kirby
Update of Math
Journal Prices by Rob Kirby
One More Revolution
to Make: Free Scientific Publishing
byKrzysztof Apt
(to appear in Communications of ACM, May 2001)
Journal
pricing in atmospheric sciences
New, Cheap Refereed Electronic Journals in Economics
``So, we should have models where we make a deal with the university, the consortia or the whole country, where we say for this amount we will allow all your people to use our material, unlimited, 24 hours per day. And, basically the price then depends on a rough estimate of how useful is that product for you; and we can adjust it over time. It is a principle, which, in my view, is not immoral. We want to distinguish between big universities vs. small universities, corporate vs. universities, and maybe rich countries vs. developing countries. There is nothing wrong in that and any combination of the three, as long as people pay something for it, because I don’t believe in giving it away for free.''Entire text of Mr. Haank's speech.
Ken Frazier, head librarian at the University of Wisconsin, calls
such consortium arrangements the ``Big Deal.''
In Frazier's opinion:
"Academic library directors should not sign on to the Big Deal or any comprehensive licensing agreements withEntire text of Mr. Frazier's article.
commercial publishers.
You read that right. Don't buy the Big Deal. The University of Wisconsin Libraries and dozens of other research
libraries also are holding out, convinced that the Big Deal serves only the Big Publishers. "
Carl Bergstrom and I have recently written a short paper that explores
the theory of site licenses for academic journals.
We argue that university site licenses serve no logistic purpose, but
are solely a fiscal instrument. In the case of journals owned by profit-maximizing
firms, these site licenses act as an instrument that allows publishers
to price discriminate more sharply than they could if they were forced
to sell journal access to individuals. Consumers' surplus of the
academic community would be greater if libraries refused to purchase
site licenses from publishes that set prices substantially above average
cost.
Here is
a pdf copy of this paper.
Evolutionary Biology
Click
here for an update on this student's experience with varsity books.